Why does the court in California keep putting up with Britney Spears and Kevin Federline when it comes to what’s decent and right for their two sons, Sean Preston and Jayden James?

If they were regular, average people walking the street, you and I both know that those kids would have been yanked - pronto - from their custody and immediately put in the care of appropriate family members or a foster home. They deserve stability and normalcy. They deserve to be in the care of adults who aren’t just plain whack-o.

Britney is reportedly getting yet another chance in court on Monday to explain herself to the judge about her recent antics and why she should still have some sort of defined custody of her sons.

Huh?

She’s got a Child Endangerment criminal report filed against her for last Thursday night’s drama at her home that required squad cars, ambulances, a police chopper overhead - and a see-through nightie to cover up a basically nude, panty-clad Brit.

As for K-Fed, what makes him a good parent? What does he do besides suck up payments from Brit? I haven’t seen any evidence that he’s a positive role model for any of his children, including the two he had with Shar Jackson.

Don’t you get the impression that justice in California when it comes to celebs and what they do in the eyes of the law is in a class all its own?

Jail sentences turn into a mere matter of hours spent behind bars. Neglect your children, you get a slap on the wrist. Cause car accidents and use controlled substances? No problem! You’ll be back in your mansion before it’s time for dinner.

And celebs wonder why we enjoy turning them all into circus freaks by goading the paps into getting that million-dollar shot of them at their worst so we can basically leer and jeer.

Sometimes we do feel a tinge of conscience, as in the case of Britney and Kevin’s little boys. They have nothing that even closely resembles a quality existence at this point in their lives.

Absolutely nothing.